CRITICAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE THEORY UNDERPINNING SPORTS PSYCHOLOGY


Introduction

This post will demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the theories of sports psychology in sports performance. Cole (2012) states that the American Psychological Association (APA) suggests that sports psychology is scientific study of the different psychological factors that are associated and affect the participants performance in physical activities. This shows that psychology looks at the areas that affect the performance of an athlete; this covers areas such as personality, motivation, and arousal. Psychology is briefly defined by Gross (1996) as:


"the science of mind and behaviour."
(Gross, 1996, p1) 

This suggests that sports psychology looks at the athlete's mind and from that looks at understanding the reasons for their actions/behaviour in different situations. From this Cherry (2014) suggest that through sports psychology a psychologist will help athletes improve performance in competitive events as well as help improve their motivation. This shows that sports psychology has its advantages in sports and can be a positive addition to different sports however not all sport use sports psychology as its a relatively new to psychology.      



Personality

Psychologists believe individuals have personality traits which are characteristics that are stable and constant throughout the individual's life. Whereas state characteristics are temporary and depend on the situation that individuals finds themselves in. Although an persons traits can be compared to another, their states can't as everyone reacts differently in a situation. This is what makes an individual unique. An individual's personality relates to their characteristics that are unique to them. Weinberg and Gould (2011) say that personality is:
"In essence, personality refers to the characteristics - or blend of characteristics - that make a person unique."
(Weinberg and Gould, 2011, p28).

This gives the opinion that depending on the person's characteristics, will result in what their personality will be like. This is further backed up by Phares (1991) with the statement:
"Everyone has their unique pattern of feelings, thoughts and behaviours, which is formed by a fairly stable combination of personality trait."
(Phares, 1991).

This shows that everyone's personality is different; this is a result of their personality traits being fairly stable, whereas everyone's feelings, thoughts and behaviours are unique to them making them individual to everyone else. 
There are many theories that try to explain a person's personality. Hollanders theory splits personality into 3 sections: Psychological Core, Typical Responses and Role-Related Behaviour. The inner section is the psychological core, Turner (2011) suggests that this section is the individuals real self and is the personality that the individual is usually unwilling to reveal. This suggest that a individual has a personality that is who they are but it's not the personality that it wants people to know. The typical response section looks at the environment that a person might find themselves in and how they react in that situation. Weinberg and Gould (2011, p28) suggests that a person's typical response is how that person will usually respond to the world around them. For example at a party someone might be quiet, a person observing this individual might come to the conclusion that he/she might be introverted, however they could be mistaken as that might this individuals response in this particular environment. 
The role-related behaviour section of Hollanders theory is the most changeable aspect of an individual's personality. This is because it looks at how you react based on the perceived surroundings. Hallam (2013) suggests that:
"Behaviour can change based on your perceptions of a situation and different situations call for a person to adapt to play different roles."
(Hallam, 2013). 

This suggests that depending on the situation an individual's behaviour will change to accommodate the situation, this behaviour change might sometimes be uncharacteristic the that individuals perceived personality. 


The psychodynamic approach theory by Freud, suggest that the behaviour from an individual can be conscious, preconscious and unconscious. The conscious is the information that the individual is focused on at the present time, the preconscious is the information outside the individual's attention but is readily available, whereas the unconscious are feelings, memories, thoughts and desire that affect day-to-day life but the individual no awareness that its influencing decisions, SparkNotes (2007). From this Freud suggested that personalities have 3 components which are: Id, Ego and Superego.


In the Bourassa video Id, Ego, Superego (2010) above, it explains the roles of the id, ego and superego. It explains that the id is an unconscious instinct of want, need, right now response. Whereas Woods (2002) suggests that ego is:
"The conscious part of personality which develops as the young child tries to find socially acceptable ways to gratify the id's demands." 
(Woods, 2002, p6) 
This suggests that a person have to develop their ego during the early developments of the childhood. It also suggest the ego looks at ways of trying to satisfy the id's demands. The superego is the individual's moral conscience; this decides if ego is behaving in a moral way. The superego stops people from doing things that they know to be wrong and this is learnt from parents and society. For example if the id's unconscious instinct is of hunger and wanting food, the ego will consciously look for solutions to satisfy the id, when it has found a solution to satisfy the id the superego will decide whether it is morally acceptable to carry out. 


Trait approach theory assumes that the personality traits are relatively stable, this suggests that these personality traits are constant across different situations. This is supported by Weinberg and Gould (2011) when they suggest that trait approach theory assumes that personality traits are constant across a variety of situations and does not consider situations that could influence an individual's behaviour.
Cattell (1965) trait theory believed that there was 16 fundamental personality factors that each of us have in some way. Cattell 16 factors of personality (16PF) suggest that there is a list of personality traits that every individual has and this list of traits has a bipolar opposite trait. The image (right) shows a questionnaire that Cattell constructed to be able to understand individual's personality. Pickren (2010) suggests that these personality traits suggested by Cattell, can be useful for understanding and predicting behaviour. This shows that when an individual completes this questionnaire then Cattell believe that you can predict their behaviour. As this theory tries to predict behaviour it doesn't take into account the different situations that the individual might find themselves in which could lead them to act out of character. This is because two people could have very similar results but put them both in the same situation and they might behave differently.             
Eysenck personality trait theory (left) suggested that an individuals overall personality was dependant on whether that individual was introvert or extrovert, this would then allow the different personality traits to be grouped together to allow for an individuals personality to be characterised, Gill (2012) says that:
"Eysenck (1968) supported Cattells work, although suggested that ‘personality types’ should be used." 
(Gill, 2012, p23).

This suggests that Eysenck tried to expand on Cattells theory by adding in his own theories. After suggesting that an individuals personality was introvert and extrovert, Eysenck further suggested that it can also be neurotic (unstable) and stable. This implies that an individual who is introvert and stable  doesn't have the same personality traits as an individual who is introvert and unstable. Woods (2002) explains that Eysenck believed that 75 percent of these traits are genetically influenced and that 25 percent of the traits are from environmental influences, suggesting that most of the traits you have you are born with. A problem with the trait theory it doesn't constantly predicts an individuals behaviour, in situations, based on their personality traits.


Another personality theory is the social learning theory. This theory suggest that rather than being born with characteristics we learn them from parents and adults we look up to and respect. McLeod (2011) states that Bandura's social learning theory suggests that:
"Behavior is learned from the environment through the process of observational learning."
(McLeod, 2011).

This suggest that an individuals behaviour cannot be predicted when in a new environment as they haven't been in that environment before they haven't experienced any observational learning. This could be supported when sports commentator suggest that youth is sometimes no match for experience. With the experienced athlete having been in the environment before he/she has learnt how to deal the situation thus changing their behaviour in that situation, whereas the young athlete is experiencing a new environment that he/she hasn't experienced before but through observational learning of the more experienced athlete their behaviour potential might change to overcome this situation. However this theory doesn't take into account any behaviours that could be inherited. 


The interactional approach theory considers the situation and personal traits to determine behaviour. This implies that neither the situation or the individuals personality trait can accurately predict behaviour, Cycling Fitness (2013) explains that the interactional approach:
"Considers both psychological traits and situational influences on behavior. The two aspects mix and independently can alter behavior."
(Cycling Fitness, 2013). 

This suggests that individuals are born with different traits and we are able to adapt these traits to different surroundings. From understanding the individual personality traits and the situation that the individual might be in then their behaviour could be predicted. This theory has the potential to help coaches and sports team as they would be able to predict the behaviour of the athlete in situations. For example a penalty shootout in a football match you would want an individual who is a bit laid back and less anxious to take the penalty as they would be more likely to score the that situation than someone who is uptight and anxious.            
        
Motivation

Motivation is the ability to be committed to do/achieve something (Riley, 2009). If an individual is motivated then it can be assumed that he/she knows the direction they're going and have high intensity levels of effort in what they are motivated in than someone who isn't motivated. This shows that the more motivated person knows what they want to do/ where they want to go as well as shows how much they want to achieve it. 
There are two types of motivation, there is intrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivation. Intrinsic motivation comes from within the individual. With it being intrinsic Thompson (2014) states that: 
"When you are intrinsically motivated, you enjoy an activity, course or skill development solely for the satisfaction of learning and having fun." 
(Thompson, 2014).

This suggest that when an individual experiences intrinsic motivation, this motivation is for self-satisfaction. This could be from achieving a target or aim before the date that was originally set, or it could just be the satisfaction of just playing and learning a sport. People would normally start playing a sport or carry on playing a sport because they were intrinsically motivated to do so. Whereas extrinsic motivation comes from external things, Vallerand (2004) states that: 
"When  extrinsically motivated, individuals do not engage in the activity out of pleasure but rather do so to derive some kind of rewards that are external to the activity itself."
(Vallerand, 2004).

This suggests that if an individual is extrinsically motivated then they get the motivation to perform a sport through the possible rewards, this could be rewards such as money, trophies, extrinsic praise or fame. This implies that although an individual will perform a sport for enjoyment (intrinsic motivation), he/she has more motivation because there is the possibility of a reward if they achieve success. An individual intrinsic and extrinsic motivations can change throughout their playing career, this could be down to new goals, performing at an elite level or family responsibilities, for example Ronnie O'Sullivan a snooker player would have started out playing snooker because he enjoyed it. This intrinsic motivation would have lead to goal setting such as first 50 break, first 100 break and first maximum break. Achieving these would have given him intrinsic motivation to carry on playing. Once he became professional, and now a career, the motivation would have become more extrinsic as he played for money. Although there would still be some intrinsic factors that motivated him the extrinsic factors would become more dominant, as he got older the responsibility of providing for a family would have become another extrinsic factor behind continuing to play. This shows how the different motivational factors change throughout an individual's career. 

Within motivation there are three different views on motivation. They are: trait-centred view, situation-centred view and interactional view. Weinberg and Gould (2011) suggest that trait-centred view motivation behaviour is a function of that individual's characteristics. They also suggest that situation-centred view looks at motivation being determined by the situation the individual finds themselves in. Whereas the interactional view of motivation suggests that motivation is neither solely from participants factors or situational factors. 

A reason why not everyone is motivated to play sports the same way this is because some just like to play and others are achievement motivated. Gill (2002) suggests that achievement motivation is:
"A person's orientation to strive for task success, persist in the face of failure, and experience pride in accomplishments."
(Gill, 2002, p61).

This suggests that an individual who is achievement motivated has the drive to accomplish tasks over and over again even if the suffer failure in the process of accomplishment. From this drive comes competitiveness when the individual has people competing against them as they drive for success. The McClelland and Atkinson motivation theory suggest that people either have high or low need to achieve (Nach) or they have high or low need to avoid failure (Naf). Huitt (2011) suggest that people given would choose between an easy or moderately hard task as this can allow them to achieve success or an excuse for why the failure occurred. An individual who needs to achieve is motivated to succeed and doesn't worry about failure, from this they are more likely to be competitive as well as more likely to accept challenges where the chances of success are low. Whereas individuals who need to avoid failure are more worried about failing and are less competitive and are more likely to accept a challenge if the chances of success is quite high. The image below shows the possible behaviour outcomes from individuals being 'Nach' or 'Naf', it suggest that individuals need to achieve will seek out situations where this is possible and look for challenges. Whereas an individual who needs to avoid failure will avoid these situation and not take risk that could result in failure.   

Another theory associated with motivation is the attribution theory. The attribution theory suggests that people want to anticipate and explain events which happen so they can create an element of stability (Flynn, 2008). This suggests that as individuals what would use this theory to understand whether they can be in control of the situation. With the attribution theory splits into three sections with Weinberg and Gould (2011) suggest these sections are:
"These most basic attribution categories are stability (a factor to which one attributes success or failure is either fairly permanent or unstable), locus of causality (a factor is either external or internal to the individual), and locus of control (a factor is or is not under our control)."
(Weinberg and Gould, 2011, p64)

This show that a performer can use this theory to understand the situation to them. In a sporting environment the performer will know if they believe in success or failure and this will decide whether they are stable or unstable, they will also know whether they are in this environment because their motivation is either internal or external. Finally by using this theory they will be able to calculate whether the outcome is in their control or not. An individual with high Naf levels will try to avoid a situation that isn't in their control.  


Achievement goal theory is another motivational theory. This theory suggests that there are three factors that determine a person's motivation these are achievement goals, perceived ability and achievement behaviour. This image from studyblue (2014) shows that key factors in the achievement goal theory. Weinberg and Gould (2011) suggest that to be able to understand someone's motivation, understanding what success and failure mean to that person must be examined. This suggests that by understanding what success and failure mean to an individual then understanding their goals as well as that individual's perception of competence, self-worth and perceived ability. This shows coaches how motivated the athlete is by the type of goals they set for themselves to improve their performance. From this the coach can get an understanding of not only what the athlete wants to achieve but also how much effort the athlete is willing to put into achieving the goals. 



The competence motivation theory suggests that people are motivated to feel worthy or competent, these feelings are suggested in this theory to be the primary determinants of motivation (Weinberg and Gould, 2011). This suggest that depending on the feedback an individual gets then that will determine their behaviour. This is supported in the model below that depending on the feedback it could affect self-esteem, perceived competence and perceived control. The outcome of that feedback would determine the motives of the individual as well as whether they enjoy what they do or not.    


From these theories it could be suggested that an individual that is highly motivated and therefore high achievers is that they have high levels of need to achieve to succeed and low levels of need to avoid failure as well as being stable and understanding the internal factors. They also believe that what they do is within their control. Individuals who are highly motivated to achieve also thrive in situations where they are being examined.    




AROUSAL AND ITS EFFECT ON SPORT PERFORMANCE


Arousal

Arousal in sports is an important psychological occurrence that can either help an individual's performance or hinder their performance. Arousal is the state of alertness and anticipation that prepares the body for action (Touch). This suggests that when an athlete arousal levels increase that is their body preparing them for the start of the event. Weinberg and Gould (2011) suggests that arousal refers to:
"The intensity dimensions of motivation at a particular moment."
(Weinberg and Gould, 2011, p77).

Comparing these quotes arousal prepares the body for the activity, depending on how motivated an athlete is to perform the activity will determine how high their arousal levels are. It further suggest that arousal is a part of the autonomic nervous system as it depends on the situation an individual finds themselves in to how aroused they are. Cavazos (n.d) suggest that if a performers arousal level becomes too high or too low then the athletes performance could suffer, some of the effects that could occur are muscle tension, decision making speed, concentration, and rhythm. This suggest that there is an optimum level of arousal where the performance of an individual is best. 

Anxiety can be linked with arousal as it is a negative emotional state that gives an person feelings of worry, apprehension and nerves (Weinberg and Gould, 2011), these feelings lead to the activation of arousal. There are three types of anxiety theses are: cognitive state anxiety, somatic state anxiety and trait anxiety. Weinberg and Gould (2011) suggests that cognitive state anxiety is the concerns people have and the negative thoughts, whereas somatic state anxiety is the changes people perceive in a moment to moment situation. They also suggest that trait anxiety is part of the individuals personality and these could influence behaviour. This suggests that if an individual has too much cognitive state anxiety then it could lead them to becoming stressed. Due to these cognitive anxiety feelings our arousal level increase to a point where the performance level decrease. It is suggested that if an athlete can learn to control their anxiety and their effects then this would benefit the performance and make it more consistent (Cycling Fitness, 2013).    



The Yerkes-Dodson law suggest that there is a relation between arousal and sports performance. Cherry (2014) says that:
"Increased arousal can help improve performance, but only up to a certain point. At the point when arousal becomes excessive, performance diminishes."
(Cherry, 2014).

This implies that an individual can't sustain the same level of arousal throughout a performance and that when arousal becomes excessive the performance level drops. This is shown in the image above. It shows that when the Yerkes-Dodson law is applied it depends on how individuals perceives the task that is in front of them. If they think the task is simple their arousal levels will rise slower than if they thought the task was complexed. This could be down to people are less motivated to do activities that they find easy, which as a coach you need to take into account when planning sessions. Compare this to the inverted-U Theory and the catastrophe theory it suggest that they limit the possibilities of the arousal level. Chambers (2011) suggests that the inverted-U theory shows that: 
"Performance will improve as arousal increases until it reaches a point where optimum performance is achieved, and arousal is at its optimum level. If arousal increases beyond this point, performance will begin to deteriorate." 
(Chambers, 2011). 

This suggests that every activity that an individual does then there is only one possible outcome and that is that arousal will increase at a steady and gradual pace this limits this theory, whereas with the Yerkes-Dodson law it is understood that the once the optimum level of arousal is achieved then the performance will drop but this takes into account the difficulty level of the task where the inverted-U theory does not. 

Whereas the catastrophe theory suggest that there might be a sudden drop in performance this would normal be when cognitive anxiety is really high. This is supported when Laj (n.d) says:
"The catastrophe theory suggests that because the athlete went beyond the optimal point, his dramatic decline in performance."
(Laj, n.d). 

This shows a different view to the inverted-U theory which suggest that there is a gradual reduction in performance. The catastrophe theory can also be seen in Yerkes-Dodson law this would be interpreted in this law because if an athlete find a task easy once you have reached optimum levels of arousal they become demotivated to keep performing at that level at an easy task resulting in a complete collapse in performance as shown in the catastrophe theory.         
       
With arousal being an important concept in understanding psychology of sport performance and the variables that relate with the individual and the situation a sports athlete finds themselves in (Cashmore, 2008). With anxiety relating to one of the variables as this would make an athlete nervous and be unable to cope with the pressures. Being able to control the level of anxiety is key for the athletes arousal level to be at the optimum of performance so they can get the best results. If an athlete is unable to do this then it could result in stress.      





THEORIES OF STRESS AND OPTIMISING SPORTS PERFORMANCE


Stress

Stress occurs when there is an imbalance between the physical and psychological demands placed upon a person that struggles to cope with these conditions. This is supported by Weinberg and Gould (2011) when they say:
"Stress is defined as a substantial imbalance between demands [physical and/or psychological] and response capability, under conditions where failure to meet that demand has important consequences."
(Weinberg and Gould, 2011, p82).

This shows that when individuals become stressed they have the inability to cope with the demands that they perceive to be too challenging for them to handle. From this it can be said that when an individual's anxiety levels become too great then they start to be unable to cope with the situation. An individual would become too nervous to be able to complete because that's a personality trait they have and they would be worrying about everything. This cognitive anxiety has become so great that it has lead to them becoming stressed as they are unable to cope with the demands that the situation shows. These demands are known as stressors. These stressors are how individuals perceive the threat of the demands Woods (1998) suggests that some of these stressors that we may perceive a threat are those which threaten our self-esteem, cause personal harm, creates uncertainty (fear of the unknown), creates frustration and creates pressure. These stressors can be internal stressors, external stressors, personal factors and occupational factors. Internal stressors come from within the athlete this is supported by Hathaway (n.d) says that:
"Internal stress is generated by your mind, both unconscious and conscious; it may be triggered by past experiences, present conditions, and expectations of future situations."
(Hathaway, n.d).

From experiences of internal stressors and athlete would start to have a pessimistic attitude, low self-esteem, lack of assertiveness and self-criticism (Len, 2009). This shows that an athlete that was once highly motivated for success and optimistic about achieving their goals, from suffering from stress is now demotivated and pessimistic. This is down to this athlete being unable to control their anxiety in stressful situation. When an athlete suffers from stress they would normally take themselves out of that environment for a couple of months as this would reduce their anxiety levels being away from the situations. Whereas external stressors are created by external situations (things in our environment) these can be the work you are doing as well as relationship that have the most impact of external stressors (Hathaway, n.d). Also Gill (2013) suggest that personal factors are people we spend our time with like family as well as being how financially secure and individual is, Gill (2013) also suggests that occupational factors are the jobs we do and the people we work with. Within sport these factor could be the people athletes work with like coaches or teammates as well as performing in a full stadium or venue, these could lead to stressors occurring.

From this there can be two types of stress, these two types of stress are eustress and distress. Singer (2013) suggests that negative stress is called distress and this comes from the feelings of your well-being threatened, whereas Perry (2012) suggest that eustress is good stress that brings positive aspect to ones life. This implies that there is a positive type of stress and a negative type of stress. Where the an athlete would use eustress to motivate themselves and improve performance, distress would decrease performance as this stress comes from high levels of anxiety which affects the arousal level of the athlete.         

The stress process is a sequences of events that will lead to a particular end, it consist of four interrelated stages which are shown in the image (left) (Weinberg and Gould 2011). in the first stage of this process there is some kind of demand placed upon an individual. This demand can either be physical or psychological, like when a parent puts pressure on a young athlete to win a race. The next stage is how an individual perceives the physical or psychological demands. this would be different in every athlete as not everyone's perception is the same. The third stage is based on how an individual responds the these demands looking at their arousal level of the body and anxiety, this could be faster heart rate, sweaty palms and feeling sick. The fourth stage looks at the athletes behaviour whilst under stress, whether they can cope or if the increase in anxiety affects their performance. It then goes back round in a cycle to the beginning stage (Weinberg and Gould, 2011). Fullerton (2010) suggest that athlete tend to suffer from more stress than non-athletes this is because athletes are required to balance part-time work, practice and games as well as family pressures.    

For an athlete being able to cope with stress is vital to performing to a high standard consistently. For an athlete to get the best results they need to try different coping mechanisms as by doing this they can get the one that works best for them. A coping strategy looks at how an athlete changes their behaviour, thoughts and emotions before competing. An athlete that was once uptight and nervous before an event that has changed their thought process for the start of an event and now doesn't think too much about what could happen could come across as more laid back and relaxed this is how they have coped with the stress involved in that environment. This athlete's coping strategy is to control their thought process better Staroversky (2012) suggest that you can also use attentional focus strategies, emotional strategies and behaviour strategies to help cope with stress.   

The video left about how Jonny Wilkinson deals with stress, shows that the way he has learnt to cope with stress is to try and increase the pressure in training to more than what it would be in a match. By doing this he is learning to cope with the increase in anxiety but allows his arousal level to stay at the optimum level of performance so his performances are consistently at a high standard. He wouldn't have started using this strategy at the beginning of his career but by changing his behaviour towards practice has found a way to deal with the pressures a game his in it. The video shows an athlete that has learnt to cope with stress to optimize his performance.  




References


Anon. (nd) Cattell's Personality Theory [Image Online] Available from: https://sites.google.com/site/psychologyofpersonalityperiod6/home/type-and-trait-theories/cattell-s-personality-theory, [Accessed 14th March 2014].

Anon. (2010) Psychology Topics > Personality [Image Online] Available from: http://www.alleydog.com/topics/personality.php#.UyLIlvl_ut4, [Accessed 14th March 2014]. 

Cashmore (2008) Sports and Exercise Psychology (ed. 2) USA, Routledge.

Cavazos (n.d) The Effects of Arousal on Sports Performance [Online] Available from: http://www.ehow.co.uk/list_6868363_effects-arousal-sports-performance.html, [Accessed 16th March 2014].  

Chambers (2011) Inverted U Theory [Online] Available from: http://pe-arousal.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/inverted-u-theory.html, [Accessed 16th March 2014].  

Cherry (2014) What is Sports Psychology? [Online] Available from: http://psychology.about.com/od/branchesofpsycholog1/f/what-is-sports-psychology.htm [Accessed 12th March 2014].

Cherry (2014) What is the Yerkes-Dodson Law? [Online] Available from: http://psychology.about.com/od/yindex/f/yerkes-dodson-law.htm, [Accessed 16th March 2014].

Clark (2010) Arousal & Performance [Image Online] Available from: http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/performance/arousal.html, [Accessed 16th March 2014]. 

Cole (2012) What is Sports Psychology? [Online] Available from: http://www.sportpsychologytoday.com/sport-psychology-for-athletes/what-is-sports-psychology/ [Accessed 6th March 2014].


Cycling Fitness (2013) The Interactional Approach In Sport Psychology [Online] Available from: http://hubpages.com/hub/The-Interactional-Approach-To-Sport-Psychology, [Accessed 14th March 2014].

Cycling Fitness (2013) Effects of Arousal and Anxiety on Sports Performance [Online] Available from: http://hubpages.com/hub/Effects-Arousal-Anxiety-Sports-Performance, [Accessed 16th March 2014].

Flynn (2008) Motivation and The Attribution Theory [Online] Available from: http://www.runireland.com/health/motivation-and-attribution-theory, [Accessed 16th March 2014].  

Fullerton (2010) Stress and Anxiety in Athletics [Image Online] Available from: http://034-hwo-1214.ussa.edu/archive/article/stress-and-anxiety-athletics, [Accessed 17th March 2014]. 

Fullerton (2010) Stress and Anxiety in Athletics [Online] Available from: http://034-hwo-1214.ussa.edu/archive/article/stress-and-anxiety-athletics, [Accessed 17th March 2014]. 

Gill (2013) Psychology of Sports Coaching, SCO/Psy, [Lecture Notes] Anxiety/Arousal/Stress Relationship, Chesterfield College, unpublished.

Gill (2012) Psychology of Sports Coaching, SCO/Psy, [Lecture Notes] Personality & Understanding your Participants, Chesterfield College, unpublished.

Gill (2002) cited in Weinberg and Gould (2011) Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology (ed.5) United States of America, Human Kinetics.  

Gross (1996) cited in Jarvis, M (1999) Sports Psychology, United States of America, Routledge. 

Hathaway (n.d) Internal and External Stress [Online] Available from: http://www.netplaces.com/hypnosis/hypnosis-and-stress/internal-and-external-stress.htm, [Accessed 17th March 2014].

Hallam (2013) What is Personality and How can it be Understood? [Online] Available from: http://cyclingfitness.hubpages.com/hub/What-is-personality-And-How-can-it-be-understood, [Accessed 13th March 2014].

Huitt (2011) Motivation to Learn: An Overview [Online] Available from: http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/motivation/motivate.html, [Accessed 15th March 2014].  


Jamstern (2010) Jonny Wilkinson Reveals his Secrets for Dealing with Stress [Online] Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0V5ZzXbWuq8, [Accessed 17th March 2014].

Laj (n.d) Catastrophe Theory and Sports Psychology [Online] Available from: http://www.ehow.co.uk/about_5537928_catastrophe-theory-sports-psychology.html, [Accessed 16th March 2014]. 

Len (2009) Internal and External Causes of Stress, What is Stress? [Online] Available from: http://www.articlesbase.com/wellness-articles/internal-and-external-causes-of-stress-what-is-stress-726168.html, [Accessed 17th March 2014]. 

McLeod (2011) Bandura - Social Learning Theory [Online] Available from: http://www.simplypsychology.org/bandura.html, [Accessed 14th March 2014].  

Parker Bourassa (2010) Id, Ego, Superego [Online Video] Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4vla_JUmAE, [Accessed 13th March 2014]. 

Perry (2012) Eustress vs. Distress: The Vital Difference of Successful People [Online] Available from: http://ithuit.com/eustress/, [Accessed 17th March 2014]. 

Phares (1991) Heinström, J. (ed) (2003) Five personality dimensions and their influence on information behaviour [Online] Available from: http://www.informationr.net/ir/9-1/paper165.html, [Accessed 10th March 2014].

Pickren (2010) Raymond Cattell: Personality Traits [Online] Avaliable from: http://www.helpingpsychology.com/raymond-cattell-personality-traits, [Accessed 14th March 2014].

Prentice-Hall (2000) Yerkes-Dodson Law [Image Online] Available from: http://cwx.prenhall.com/bookbind/pubbooks/morris3/chapter8/custom5/deluxe-content.html, [Accessed 16th March 2014].   

Riley (2009) Q&A - What is Motivation? [Online] Available from: http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/business-studies/comments/qa-what-is-motivation, [Accessed 15th March 2014].  

Singer (2013) Distress and Eustress. Do you Know the Difference? [Online] Available from: http://drjacksinger.com/distress-and-eustress-do-you-know-the-difference/, [Accessed 17th March 2014]. 

SparkNotes (2005) Personality [Online] Available from: http://www.sparknotes.com/psychology/psych101/personality/section1.rhtml, [Accessed 12th March 2014].

SparkNotes (2007) Psychodynamic Theories [Online] Available from: http://www.sparknotes.com/psychology/psych101/personality/section2.rhtml, [Accessed 13th March 2014].

Staroversky (2012) Coping Strategies Used by Elite Athletes [Online] Available from: http://staroversky.com/blog/coping-strategies-used-by-elite-athletes, [Accessed 17th March 2014]. 

StudyBlue (2014) CH3: Motivation [Online Image] Available from: http://www.studyblue.com/notes/note/n/ch3-motivation/deck/5410199, [Accessed 15th March 2014]. 


StudyBlue (2014) CH3: Motivation [Online Image] Available from: http://www.studyblue.com/notes/note/n/ch3-motivation/deck/5410199, [Accessed 16th March 2014]. 


Thompson (2014) The Difference Between Intrinsic Motivation & Extrinsic Motivation [Online] Available from: http://www.livestrong.com/article/174305-the-difference-between-intrinsic-motivation-extrinsic-motivation/, [Accessed 15th March 2014].

Touch (n.d) Arousal [Online] Available from: http://www.jerseytouch.co.uk/arousal.html, [Accessed 16th March 2014].


Turner (2011) Personality and Self Concept [Online] Available from: http://ashleaturner.blogspot.co.uk/2011/02/personality-and-self-concept.html, [Accessed 13th March 2014]. 

Vallerand (2004) Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Sport [Online] Available from: http://www.er.uqam.ca/nobel/r26710/LRCS/papers/128.pdf, [Accessed 15th March 2014]. 

Weinberg and Gould (2007) Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology (ed.4) [Image Online] Available from: http://ess220.wordpress.com/films/9-billy-elliot/, [Accessed 16th March 2014].  

Weinberg and Gould (2011) Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology (ed.5) United States of America, Human Kinetics. 

Woods (2002) Psychology in Practice: Sport, London, Hodder Education. 

Woods (1998) Applying Psychology to Sport, Great Britain, Hodder & Stoughton Education.  

Wordpress (n.d) Being in 'the zone': Sport's Holy Grail [Image Online] Available from: http://elitesportconsulting.wordpress.com/tag/catastrophe-theory/, [Accessed 16th March 2014]. 
2

View comments

    Loading